Lifecycle Leverage Calculator

Lifecycle investing says your target exposure isn't about how much you already have — it's about how much you can still invest over your working life. Enter your net worth and total wealth (or let the wizard estimate it) to see the exposure and leverage you should be aiming for right now.

Age

Net worth & income

Model settings

Target stock share (Samuelson ratio)Lifecycle investing says your total wealth (net worth + human capital) shouldn't be entirely in stocks — the optimal share depends on market returns, volatility and your own risk aversion. The formal formula is risk premium ÷ (risk aversion × return variance), and it varies by person and by market — it can even exceed 100%. This tool simplifies it into a slider you can adjust yourself.71%

71% is the starting value, estimated from 0050's realized 1994–2025 volatility (σ≈26%) as a conservative Taiwan case; the US benchmark lands around 83%; a more optimistic Taiwan parameter set can reach about 99%. Higher means you can tolerate more volatility.

Leverage ceiling (safety net)The maximum leverage you're practically willing to run — no matter how high the theoretical target exposure is, target exposure never exceeds net worth × this ceiling. 200% is a commonly cited safe value, but it's a guardrail, not an instruction.200%

Your target right now

Target exposure
200K
Target leverage
2.00×Capped at 200%
Current net worthYour total assets minus total debt today.100K
Implied annual contribution(Total wealth − net worth) ÷ years remaining — spreads the human capital evenly across your working years, giving a rough sense of how much you'd need to invest annually to reach that total wealth assumption.9K
Curious what you're actually exposed to right now? Compare with the Exposure & Leverage Ratio Calculator

Leverage glide path

As financial capital builds up and human capital runs out, the target leverage naturally glides down from its peak — that's the spirit of lifecycle investing, not staying maxed out forever.

0%50%100%150%200%305172100% investedCeiling 200%Retirement (age 65)

X-axis: age

Your lifetime total wealth is 419K — even at a 71% Samuelson share, that's well above what your leverage ceiling (200%) allows for a net worth of 100K. To keep risk in check, exposure is capped there, landing target exposure at 200K.

Support the creator

Did this tool help you? ☕

This is a free side project I built in my spare time. If it saved you time or helped you think through a decision, buying me a coffee keeps the lights on!

Buy me a coffee

Target leverage — FAQ

What is 'target exposure', and how is it different from the Exposure & Leverage Ratio Calculator?
The Exposure & Leverage Ratio Calculator measures what you're actually exposed to right now. This tool estimates what you should be aiming for. Lifecycle investing argues that when you're young, your net worth is only a small slice of your true lifetime wealth — you still have years of future income (human capital) that belongs in your risk capacity. You can't literally invest tomorrow's paycheck today, so leverage is the closest practical way to approximate that target.
I don't know my 'lifetime total wealth' — what do I do?
Click "estimate it for me" next to the input, and a small wizard asks a few simple questions — annual income, savings rate, how stable your job is (zh-TW users can also pick their industry to auto-fill income) — then fills an estimate back into the main field, which you can still adjust by hand. The formula behind it: job risk coefficient × annual income × savings rate × years remaining gives human capital, which gets added to your current net worth.
Why isn't the target 100% of lifetime wealth — why multiply by a 'Samuelson share'?
Because stocks carry volatility risk, putting your entire wealth — including human capital you haven't earned yet — into the market isn't the risk-adjusted optimum. The formal Samuelson (or Merton) share formula is risk premium ÷ (risk aversion × return variance), which needs market expected return, volatility, and personal risk aversion, and varies by person and by market. This tool simplifies it into a slider you can move yourself, defaulting to 71% (a conservative Taiwan case from 0050's realized 1994–2025 volatility); the US benchmark is around 83%; a more optimistic Taiwan parameter set can reach about 99% — there's no universal answer, and higher means you can tolerate more volatility.
Why does the leverage ceiling default to 2× (200%)?
2× is the commonly cited safe ceiling in lifecycle investing and in this site's exposure-ratio article: at L× leverage, a market drop of just 1/L wipes out your net worth, and 2× means it takes a 50% drop to zero you out. In this tool it's an adjustable guardrail, not a fixed rule — dial it up or down based on your own risk tolerance.
I don't know my annual income — how do I estimate it?
Pick the closest match from the industry dropdown and the tool fills in Taiwan DGBAS's official 2024 median annual total compensation for that industry. It's an official median, not your personal number, so treat it as a reasonable starting point you can still overwrite.
Why does the target leverage fall as you get older?
Human capital (income you haven't earned yet) shrinks as years remaining drops, while net worth typically grows over time. That shifting ratio pulls the target — total wealth times the Samuelson share — back down relative to net worth on its own; it's the mechanical reason lifecycle investing says to lever up early and delever as retirement nears, with no separate taper rule needed.
Does this target mean I should adjust my holdings right now?
No — treat it as a reference point, not an instruction. Whether and how fast to move toward it depends on your loss tolerance, the tax cost of your current holdings, borrowing rates, and liquidity. Check your actual current leverage with the Exposure & Leverage Ratio Calculator first, then close the gap gradually rather than all at once.
How do I choose the job risk coefficient?
'Stable' fits civil-service or large-company salaried roles with low volatility and low layoff risk. 'General' is the default for most employees. 'Volatile' fits commission-based work, freelancing, startups, or cyclical industries where income can swing with the market or the economy. If your day job's income is itself highly correlated with the stock market (brokerage, real estate agency), picking 'Volatile' — or manually lowering the coefficient further on the slider — is more conservative and closer to lifecycle investing's spirit that your job may already BE a form of exposure.

Sources

Built by indigo.la.ringo · AppicLab ·

More small utilities from AppicLab

The Lifecycle Leverage Calculator flips the question most leverage tools ask. Instead of measuring what you're currently exposed to, it estimates what you should be aiming for. It follows the method at lci.atticus.tw directly (minus that calculator's retirement-withdrawal validator, its full per-profession lookup table, and its detailed Taiwan-vs-US Samuelson parameter comparison — simplified here instead): it only needs two numbers — your current net worth, and your lifetime total wealth (net worth plus the future income you can still invest). Don't know your total wealth? Click "estimate it for me" and answer a few simple questions about income, savings rate and job stability — the wizard fills in an estimate you can still adjust. Already know your number? Just type it in. From there, total wealth is multiplied by an adjustable "Samuelson share" and capped at a leverage ceiling you can set yourself (defaults to 2× / 200%) as a practical safety net, and the tool works out your target exposure and leverage right now, with a glide-path chart showing how that target naturally tapers as retirement gets closer.

indigo.la.ringo

About the Author

indigo.la.ringo

A software engineer chasing the slash-career dream. Was trying to figure out my relationship with the world — now being forced to figure out my relationship with AI. Lately, obsessed with figuring out the relationship between people and money. Either way, whatever answer I land on, it's fine.